Sunday, February 20, 2011

Outside Reading: Book Review 4

2/20/11
Book Review
Book Author: Allison Pearson
Review Author: Veronique de Turenne


     When Veronique de Turenne begins her review on the book I Think I Love You, by Allison Pearson, one is immediately caught off guard by Turenne’s use of diction. She does a nice job summarizing the book for the reader: a 13 year old girl named Petra Williams is in love with a certain pop celebrity. Turenne, with such phrases as “Darwinian nightmare” and “Bambi-eyed pop god,” allows the reader to revel in the choice of words of both herself and the numerous quotations from Pearson that are witty as well. For example, Turenne cites Pearson’s description of the most voluptuous girl of the teen group, quoting that her breasts were, “developed overnight as though she'd got fed up of waiting and used a bike pump.”
     The charming details that Turenne presents are, of course, the result of an already charming novel by Pearson. These details are best appreciated in Pearson’s description of characters. As another addition to Pearson’s lovely description of Petra’s womanly friend, Pearson also writes that she handles her breasts, “like they were hamsters, even getting them out occasionally and petting them.” Such overflowing details add to the overall whimsical nature of this review.
     The imagery created by Pearson is not only believable for an audience, it is also quite humorous. For example, Turenne quotes Pearson when Pearson is describing what Petra Williams does in her day: “She devours fan mags, memorizes David Cassidy facts, and sleeps on her back ‘so my face was ready to receive a kiss in case he came in the night.’" With this irresistible humor, the reader is ready to receive this book, and its review, with open arms.
     Although I do not argue that this review is written with a specific critical perspective, I could see it potentially being called a New Historicism piece because Turenne does mention and comment on the author’s “wit and skill.” One connection I can make with this review is during a brief discussion that we had during class in which we discussed the difference between true literature and mass fiction. Turenne does lovingly note that this novel is a bit of “chick lit,” which is understandable because of its lighthearted plot developments.

Monday, February 7, 2011

Class Notes (1/24-2/4)

Literary Terms to Know (Worksheet):

Anaphora: emphasizing words by repeating them at the beginningsof neighboring clauses
Ex: "We shall not flag or fail. We shall go on to the end. We shall fight in france..."
Antistrophe: the repetition of the same word or words at the end of successive phrases, clauses or sentences with an emphasis placed on the last word in a phrase or sentence.
Ex: "When I was a child, I spoke as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child."
Anadiplosis: repetition of a word or phrase from the end of one clause or phrase at the begining of the next clause or phrase
Ex: "Fear leads to anger. Anger leads to hate. Hate leads to suffering."
Polysyndeton: the repetition of conjunctions in a series of coordinate words, phrases, or clauses
Ex: "I said, "Who killed him?" and he said, "I don't know who killed him but he's dead all right," and it was dark and there was water standing in the street and no lights..."
Alliteration: the repetition of initial sounds, usually consonants
Ex: Silly Stacy sat slouched.
Assonance: use of similar vowel sounds repeated in successive or proximate words containing different consonants
Ex: " A city that is set on a hill cannot be hid."
Consonance: the repetition of consonants, especially at the ends of words
Ex: "We ought to head straight, right?"
Chiasmus: figure of speech in which two or more clauses or related to each other through a reversal of structures in order to make a larger point; the clauses display inverted parallelism. In its classical application, chiasmus would have been used for structures that do not repeat the same words and phrases, but invert a sentence's grammatical structure or ideas; note, when a piece of text involves grammatical structure, it is also antithesis
Ex: "He knowingly lied and we blindly followed."
    -Antithesis: subcategory of Chiasmus; establishing a clear, contrasting relationship b/w two ideas by joining them together or juxtaposing them, often in parallel structure
    Ex: "To err is human; to forgive, divine"

Lecture Summary: Archetypal and Mythological Criticism (Packet):
  • AMC defintion: how an individual text is faithful to and how it deviates from common patterns
  • a myth is a complete story often believed to be true by cultural insiders but believed false by cultural outsiders
  • an archetype is any element of fiction taht we see repeated over and over w/its core meaning unchanged
  • archetypes are literary reflections of experiences widely shared by humanity
  • James Frazer noticed that myths tend to have striking similarities from culture to culture
  • Carl Jung, an early 20th Century Swiss psychiatrist, thout the reason for reoccuring patterns in myth might be an underlying structure of the human mind
  • "Collective unconsiousness" with a repository of emotions, ideas, instincts, and even memories shared by all humans and that archetypes were symbolic representations of this hidden part of ourselves
  • Northrop Frye was the first theorist to try to organize schemes of literature; he postulated that there is one story being told over and over; some works tell whole story, others just parts of it
*See worksheet for other lovely definitions :)

What makes it a novel? (handout):
  • any extended fictional narrative almost always in prsoe
  • character ocurs either in a static condition or in the process of development as the result of events or actions
  • "novel" doesn't imply a certain structure; they can take other forms aside from the standard five-part plot
  • novels always conntain narrative, though it may be non-traditional (ex: stream of consciousness)
  • in contemporary popular usage, the nerm is generally only applied to works with enduring literary merit
  •  before 18th century -> ROMANCE
  •  after 18th century -> NOVEL
  •  less than 50,000 words -> NOVELLA
The Novel (A Handout):
  • "little new thing"; the term novel is roman-derived from the medieval term romance
  • novella: b/w 12,000 and 30,000 words
  • in a novel, the fictional prose narrative is conveyed by the author through a specific point of view and connected by a serquence of events involving a group of persons in a specific setting
  • the first European novel is usually considered to be Don Quixote by Miguel de Cervantes (1605)
  • novel took to England in first half of the 18th century: Daniel Defoe (Robinson Crusoe), Samuel Richardson (Pamela) and Henry Fielding (Tom Jones)
  • By the second half of the 19th century, the novel had displaced all other forms of literature because of the growing middle class (increased literacy rate and disposable income), cheaper production and distribution of materials, publication of novels in serial form, and the introduction of a system of circulating libraries
  • Early 20th century novel was influenced by new social attitudes ans psych insights; authors paid close attention to character though and motivation, and this is still the dominant form of literary expression today
  • the novel can cover a wide range of tastes and interests
See Worksheet for more depth, but here's the lists of some common types of novels:

Prose Romance
Novel of Incident
Novel of Character
Novel of Manners
Epistolary Novel
Picaresque Novel
Historical Novel
Regional Novel (*connection* Huck Finn!)
Bildungsroman
Roman a clef
Roman-fleuve
Sociological/Roman a these (*Connection* Children of Men)
Stream of Consciousness
Gothic
Gothic Romance (*connection* The Handmaid's Tale)
Satirical: (*connection* Twelfth night, if it were not a play, would qualify)

Monday, January 10, 2011

Outside Reading: Editorial 3

1/10/11


(No listed author)

The editorial “Bloodshed and Invective in Arizona” (no named author) addresses the tragic events surrounding the shooting at a public event sponsored by Representative Gabrielle Giffords (D-Az) in Tucson, Arizona. Though the tone of this piece is a bit bland and dull, one cannot help noticing some of the controversial topics (such as insanity pleas, border control, and gun rights) that are being addressed by this unnamed speaker’s matter-of-fact voice.

Although this is probably quite stereotypical of me, I feel like the author of this piece is most likely a man. I feel like, as a girl, if I were writing about a topic as tragic as this, I would end up discussing the feelings of those directly and indirectly affected by this atrocity. The voice of this author, although it does lightly address how many people were killed or injured at the shooting, to me, does not seem exactly personable. The author, rather, prefers to focus on the political causes and ramifications of the shooting.

I definitely dislike the voice of this particular author. ‘He’ assumes too much, like when ‘he’ says, “It is facile and mistaken to attribute this particular madman’s act directly to Republicans or Tea Party members. But it is legitimate to hold Republicans and particularly their most virulent supporters in the media responsible for the gale of anger that has produced the vast majority of these threats, setting the nation on edge.” Because I am politically independent with a Republican leaning, I take offense to ‘his’ quick reaction to point fingers to the Republican Party.

One thing that I wholeheartedly approve of, however, is the author’s use of structure in this piece. ‘He’ begins with a recognizable event prior to the subject he will be discussing. ‘He’ gives us background information on the shooter. ‘He’ informs us, the audience, of the major increase in threats against Congress members. The author then closes with a laundry list of issues that pertain to not only the southwestern region of the country, but also the United States as a whole. This clean-cut structure gives the reader a sense of comfortable repetition to cling to while reading.

Of all of the outside readings I have completed, I could see this piece as an AP essay the most easily. The speaker’s tone is simplistic, yet well-learned. Informative, yet mildly interesting. In other words, the speaker knows enough about the subject to correctly inform the reading audience of all the relevant facts, while also presenting one person’s “spin” on the causes and effects of this subject.

Outside Reading: Reflective Essay 3

The Partly Cloudy Patriot by Sarah Vowell; published 2002
(borrowed from Ms. Holmes)
Essay: “Wonder Twins”
January 10, 2011
Pg 141-146

As usual, Sarah Vowell’s unusual humor catches the reader pleasantly off-guard in her essay entitled, “Wonder Twins.” “In December 1999,” she writes, “the Associated Press released a photograph of Luther and Johnny Htoo, twelve-year-old twin brothers commanding a ragtag guerrilla army in the rain forest of Myanmar (formerly Burma)… Every time I saw the picture the first thing that popped into my head was this: I miss my sister.”

Being a fraternal twin, Sarah uses the Htoo brothers as a way of comparing her domestic twin life with her sister, Amy, to that of the Htoo brothers and “God’s Army.” Using her obviously sarcastic tone, created by the absurdity of some of her comparisons, Vowell makes references to both her childhood and adulthood with Amy. “I’m a single careerist with a walk-up apartment in New York City; she’s a married, dog-owning mother in Montana with a, swear to God, white picket fence.”

Amusingly, Vowell writes, “The similarities are uncanny. Luther and Johnny were illiterate, Baptist, messianic insurgents struggling against the government of Myanmar, and my sister Amy and I shared a locker all through junior high.”  Vowell cites these kinds of “domestic” events to contrast the unstable childhood of their Myanmar counterparts. I wonder if the creative phrasing of her life’s events just comes naturally to her…

Vowell’s unorthodox voice makes me laugh, ponder, and sigh, all at once. I laugh because of some of the ridiculous remarks that she makes about events that have happened to her and her sister, such as when her sister threw up on her and how her sister thought it was so funny that she went and got their parents, who took a picture. I ponder what it would be like to have a twin. Because my father has an identical twin, I can understand many of the feelings that Vowell discusses, but on the other hand, being an only child, I never got to experience the benefits and many disadvantages of having a sibling.

I could potentially see this piece being used as an AP Prompt, or possibly as one of the essays that the ACT uses on the reading section. Students could easily write an essay in response to reading this essay: whether it be to discuss Vowell’s voice throughout the piece, or whether it be to analyze her relationship with her sister in contrast to that of the relationship between the Htoo twins.

Outside Reading: Book Review 3

1/10/11

Book: THE LIFE AND OPINIONS OF MAF THE DOG, AND OF HIS FRIEND MARILYN MONROE By Andrew O’Hagan

Review titled: In Aphrodite’s Arms

By ROBIN ROMM

The witty review by Robin Romm, titled “In Aphrodite’s Arms,” summarizes both the literary and stylistic highlights of the novel “THE LIFE AND OPINIONS OF MAF THE DOG, AND OF HIS FRIEND MARILYN MONROE” by Andrew O’Hagan.
Romm begins his review by discussing the somewhat unique perspective that the book is narrated in: the perspective of a dog, that is. Mafia Honey, a “fluffy but sharp-eyed Maltese terrier” ends up, after various owners, in the hands of Marilyn Monroe. As Romm explains, Maf witnesses Marilyn’s actions during times when no other “person” could have, such as during her psychoanalytic sessions. Romm goes on to call Maf “a proponent of the working class” while simultaneously being “a bit of a pompous snob.” Romm also mentions that “As appreciative as [Maf] is of the underdog, his life is such that he never has to be one.”  Romm continues by thoroughly discussing how Marilyn is portrayed by Maf in the piece, specifically noting Maf’s educated language that allows him to depict Marilyn Monroe in deeper detail.
After discussing some of the unique qualities of the book, Romm goes on to lightly criticize the story-telling abilities of Maf the dog. “Despite his ease with language and his rich turns of phrase, Maf’s name-dropping can be slightly overwhelming.” Yet, Romm goes on to give the novel a half-criticism half-compliment, stating, “[Maf’s name-dropping] slows the pace of this precise, impressively researched book.”
Romm uses a Formalistic Critical Perspective, mainly discussing the stylistic and plot techniques used by Andrew O’Hagan to piece together this fantastic storyline. He notes the tone used by Maf as “studious and perceptive,” while also alluding to one of the novel’s themes: not understanding human emotion. Romm, throughout the entire review of the novel, hints to the audience that using Maf as a narrator further perpetuates this theme.
Although it is hard to relate the storyline of this novel to any other, I am reminded of the importance of the narrator. Some books have generic and boring narrators, where all the audience learns about is the frailty of the flowers and the wind blowing through the trees. Other books have eccentric narrators who sometimes get caught up with any little detail that they deem important. And yet other books are told by a narrator who specifically fits into the book itself. In this novel, Maf is a foil to Marilyn. Making this connection, Romm notes Maf’s dialogue in which he states that Marilyn baby-talks him and, in doing so, makes up his personality for him. Brilliantly, he then goes on to say that this is what the studio bosses are doing to her.

Sunday, January 9, 2011

Week 4 Notes (1/3-1/10)

This past week we have been watching the film "Death of A Salesman" and discussing the text. We have been focusing on:
  • The relationship between Willy and Linda. (Does she mother him too much? Is their dynamic healthy?)
  • The relationship between Willy and Biff. (Why is Biff the favorite and not Happy?)
  • The relationship between Linda and her sons. (How does she favor Willy over her sons? Is this okay?)
  • The relationship between Willy and his dreams/society. (Why/Is Willy a failure? What led to his downfall?)
  • The significance of "The Woman."
  • Why is Happy/Harold such a failure?
  • Is Willy responsible for his death?
The Lowman family reminds me a lot of the Joad family in the novel "The Grapes of Wrath." The entire Joad family heads to California in search of a new life, but society gives them nothing in return except for death and exploitation.

Week... 3? December 13-17

Okay, so i'm really confused if we needed to post notes for this week or not. I believe this is the week we watched Rosencrantz and Guildenstern and discussed the "Lecture on Stoppard." Maybe? Possibly? If you know whether we're supposed to post notes for this week, let me know!